Trump 대통령 Facebook 활용 못하게 해달라, Zuckerberg지원금 받은 과학자들 성토. 정치에 발들여놓으면 안되는데.... 아무리 트럼프 대통령이 선동적이고, 확실치않은 정보를 흘려 혼동 시키는 점이 있다해도, 과학자들이 정치적 발언하는것, 나는 개인적으로 동의 하지는 않는다. 지금은 Coronavirus Pandemic으로 전세계가 바짝 긴장상태에 있는 상황인, 매우 민감한 때에, 연구에 몰두해야할 과학자들의 경솔한 발언은 쉽게 이해가 되질 않는다.
흑백갈등으로 그렇치 않아도 전미국을 포함한 전지구촌이 발칵 뒤집혔는데....
그분들의 바른 생각은 높이 사지만, 그들이 과학자라고 신분을 밝힌이상은, 지금은 때가 아닌거라고 나는 생각한다. Joe Biden 또는 Barack Obama처럼 정치를 하는 분들이라면 충분히 이해 하지만...그시간에 좀더 연구에 노력해서, Coronavirus Pandemic 퇴치를 위한 Vaccine개발에 더 노력을 기울였더라면 더 높이 노고를 칭찬 받았을텐데....
흑백 인종간의 분규는 성경에 의하면 태초이후로 지금까지 계속되는 풀지못하는 숙제라고 생각한다.
흑인 대통령 Obama 가 8년간 미국의 대통령을 했었지만, 나의 생각으로는 단 한이슈라도 눈에 띄게 개선됐었다고 믿지 않는다. 미국 역사상 흑인대통령을 선출했을때는 뭔가 흑인들이 억울하게 당하는 사회적 문제점을 좀 개선해 줄것을 염원했었던 것으로 이해했고, 나역시 열심히 응원 했었다. 결과는 변화된것 없었다.
그러나 Zuckerberg는 정치적 냄새가 나는 발언들에 흔들리지 않고 고유의 위치를 지키면서, 트럼프의 Facebook 활용에 제재를 하지 않았다. 나는 그점을 높이 사고싶다. 암튼 어서 빨리 흑백분규와 Coronavirus Pandemic퇴치를 위한 Vaccine 개발의 희소식이 전세계에 울려퍼지기를 기원한다. 지금은 본연의 임무를 떠나 정치적 발언하는것 보다는, Vaccine개발이 절대 절명의 명제이니까.
Frank Bajak, The Associated Press
Published Saturday, June 6, 2020 7:36PM EDT
Last Updated Saturday, June 6, 2020 10:45PM EDT
BOSTON - Dozens of scientists doing research funded by Mark Zuckerberg
say Facebook should not be letting President Donald Trump use the social
media platform to “spread both misinformation and incendiary
statements.”
The researchers, including 60 professors at leading U.S. research institutions, wrote the Facebook CEO on Saturday asking Zuckerberg to “consider stricter policies on misinformation and incendiary language that harms people,” especially during the current turmoil over racial injustice.
The letter calls the spread of “deliberate misinformation and divisive language” contrary to the researchers' goals of using technology to prevent and eradicate disease, improve childhood education and reform the criminal justice system.
Their mission “is antithetical to some of the stances that Facebook has been taking, so we're encouraging them to be more on the side of truth and on the right side of history as we've said in the letter,” said Debora Marks of Harvard Medical School, one of three professors who organized it.
The others are Martin Kampmann of the University of California-San Francisco and Jason Shepherd of the University of Utah. All have grants from a Chan Zuckerberg Initiative program working to prevent, cure and treat neurodegenerative disorders including Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease.
They said the letter had more than 160 signatories. Shepherd said about 10% are employees of foundations run by Zuckerberg and his wife, Priscilla Chan.
The letter objects specifically to Zuckerberg's decision not to at least flag as a violation of Facebook's community standards Trump's post that stated “when the looting starts, the shooting starts” in response to unrest in Minneapolis over the videotaped killing of George Floyd, a black man, by a white police officer. The letter's authors called the post “a clear statement of inciting violence.”
Twitter had both flagged and demoted a Trump tweet using the same language.
In a statement, the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative noted that the philanthropic organization is separate from Facebook and said “we are grateful for our staff, partners and grantees” and “respect their right to voice their opinions, including on Facebook policies.”
Some Facebook employees have publicly objected to Zuckerberg's refusal to take down or label misleading or incendiary posts by Trump and other politicians. But Zuckerberg - who controls a majority of voting shares in the company - has so far refused.
On Friday, Zuckerberg said in a post that he would review “potential options for handling violating or partially-violating content aside from the binary leave-it-up or take-it-down decisions”
“I know many of you think we should have labeled the President's posts in some way last week,” he wrote. “Our current policy is that if content is actually inciting violence, then the right mitigation is to take that content down - not let people continue seeing it behind a flag. There is no exception to this policy for politicians or newsworthiness.”
The researchers, including 60 professors at leading U.S. research institutions, wrote the Facebook CEO on Saturday asking Zuckerberg to “consider stricter policies on misinformation and incendiary language that harms people,” especially during the current turmoil over racial injustice.
The letter calls the spread of “deliberate misinformation and divisive language” contrary to the researchers' goals of using technology to prevent and eradicate disease, improve childhood education and reform the criminal justice system.
Their mission “is antithetical to some of the stances that Facebook has been taking, so we're encouraging them to be more on the side of truth and on the right side of history as we've said in the letter,” said Debora Marks of Harvard Medical School, one of three professors who organized it.
The others are Martin Kampmann of the University of California-San Francisco and Jason Shepherd of the University of Utah. All have grants from a Chan Zuckerberg Initiative program working to prevent, cure and treat neurodegenerative disorders including Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease.
They said the letter had more than 160 signatories. Shepherd said about 10% are employees of foundations run by Zuckerberg and his wife, Priscilla Chan.
The letter objects specifically to Zuckerberg's decision not to at least flag as a violation of Facebook's community standards Trump's post that stated “when the looting starts, the shooting starts” in response to unrest in Minneapolis over the videotaped killing of George Floyd, a black man, by a white police officer. The letter's authors called the post “a clear statement of inciting violence.”
Twitter had both flagged and demoted a Trump tweet using the same language.
In a statement, the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative noted that the philanthropic organization is separate from Facebook and said “we are grateful for our staff, partners and grantees” and “respect their right to voice their opinions, including on Facebook policies.”
Some Facebook employees have publicly objected to Zuckerberg's refusal to take down or label misleading or incendiary posts by Trump and other politicians. But Zuckerberg - who controls a majority of voting shares in the company - has so far refused.
On Friday, Zuckerberg said in a post that he would review “potential options for handling violating or partially-violating content aside from the binary leave-it-up or take-it-down decisions”
“I know many of you think we should have labeled the President's posts in some way last week,” he wrote. “Our current policy is that if content is actually inciting violence, then the right mitigation is to take that content down - not let people continue seeing it behind a flag. There is no exception to this policy for politicians or newsworthiness.”
https://www.cp24.com/world/zuckerberg-funded-scientists-rein-in-trump-on-facebook-1.4972956
No comments:
Post a Comment