Thursday, June 04, 2020

Trudeau 수상, Covid-19 재난지원금 내돈 쓰듯이 맘데로, 국민들은 깜깜- 한국의 문재인 정부와 어쩜 똑 같을까?

이번 Coronavirus Pandemic으로 캐나다 정부는 천문학적 숫자에 달하는 재난 보조금을 캐네디언들에게 뿌리고 있다는 뉴스가, 오늘은 없었지만, 며칠전만 해도, 하루건너 한건씩 방송에 퍼져 나왔었다.

Pandemic으로 캐나다 전체를 Lockdown시키니 모든 사회적 활동, 특히 Small Business 운영자들이 먼저 직격탄을 맞고, 공장이, Giant Super Market,  Home Depot, IKEA같은 큰 Hardware Store들이 Shut down되고...

Shut down으로 직장을 잃은 노동자들, 식당운영자들을 비롯한 소상공인들, Small Property Landloar들, 65세이상의 연금 수령자들....재난 보조금을 4개월간 즉 6월까지 매달 지급한다는 반가운 뉴스였었다.

내경우에는 Small property Landlord구룹에 속해, 회계사를 만나 재난보조금 수령할 자격이 있나 없나를 확인하기위해 미팅을 했었다.  우선 소유하고 있는 Property에 Mortgage가 있는지의 여부를 확인하는게 아닌가.
물론 은퇴할때, 무리를 해서 Mortgage를 다 Pay off했기에, 나는 남에게 빚이 없는 자유인이 되여 나름데로 자존심을 갖고 내자력으로 살아간다고 좋아 했었는데.... 이게 자격요건 미달이라는 것이었다. 그래서 불합격.

65세 이상의 연금수령자들에게도 재난보조금을 일률적으로 지급한다고 해서 좋아 했었는데... 아직까지 내통장에 들어온 보조금은 없었다.  아는 친지분들은 어떤가?고 서로 연락을 해봤는데, 그친지분들 역시 감감 무소식이라고 했다.  기자회견에서 발표했던 그대로 믿으면 실망이 클수 있다는 경험을 하게 된것이다. Coronavirus Pandemic을 핑계대로, 의회에서 토론후 결정된 예산을 사용해야하는 절차를 완전히 Bypass하면서 포퓰리즘 정책을 시행하고 있으나, 나같은 Senior에게는 아직까지 이번 Pandemic 으로 국가에서 나누어주는 재난보호기금을 받은적이 없다.  그런데 분명히 뉴스 브리핑에서는 모든 Senior들에게 보조금을 준다고 들었었는데.... 후에 다시 정정 보도한것을 보면, Senior 모두에게 지원금지급 발표는 실수였다는 것이다.

중국의 시진핑과 같은 동급의 독재자도 아니면서, 트루도는 의회토론과 정부의 철저한 조사과정도 거치지않고, Covid-19 전염병을 핑계대고 국민건강과 경제적 이유를 들어 자유자재로 사용하고 있다. 지난주에 투르도수상은 Pandemic을 핑계대로 9월 21일까지 의회의 Session은 열리지 않는다고 발표했었다.  의회에서 토의를 한후 정부예산 및 기금을 사용했으나 이번 Pandemic기금에서는 그런절차는 전연 없었다.

트루도와 자유당정부는 의회주의를 채택하고있는 캐나다에서 의회토론이 먼저 이루어져함을 완전 배제하고, Pandemic을 핑계대고 그들의 정치적 입지를 다지기위한 어드밴티지를 다 활용하고 있다. 9월 21일 의회가 다시 Session을 하게될때까지, 야당의 간섭없이 필요하면, 포퓰리즘을 염두에 둔 지원금 지급을 계속할수 있게된다는 뜻인데... 그럴 가능성은 높은것 같다. 현재 Daily 확진자 데이타에 의하면 줄어들지 않고, 현수준을 유지하거나 더 많아지고 있는 형국이기 때문이다.

한국에서도 똑같은 현상이 일어나고있다. 국회는 일종의 구색마추기의 한축일 뿐이고, 재난 보조금을 주머니돈 나누어 주는 식으로, 수십조원씩 퍼주고 있는데, 국회는 완전왕따 당하고 있는데도, 여당 야당할것없이 아예 청와대에 "국회에서 토론하고 그다음에 재난보조금 활용을 해야 정상적인 민주주의 절차를 따르는길이 아닌가?"라고 이의를 제기하는 목소리는 못들었었다. Pandemic 재난이기에... 라고, 아예 이유를 부치지도 못하게 하고, 마치 중국의 시진핑주석처럼 독재자로서의 철권을 휘두르고있고, 국민들은 내일을 생각지않고, 한푼 던져주는 그맛에 황공무지로소이다하고있다.  대한민국의 현실이다. 

이다음에 외상으로 앞당겨 받아먹은 재난지원금은 누가 갚아야 하는가? 전부 국민들이 세금으로 갚아야 하는데, 마치 하늘에서 돈이 공짜로 떨어져 나누어주는식으로 생색을 내는 정치꾼들이 정말 큰 걱정이다. 대통령이 왜 재난 지원금을 타야 하는가? 그리고 그지원금을 모아서 불우이웃돕기에 Donation했다는 뉴스가 참으로 가증스럽다. 그래도 캐나다 수상은 본인이 재난지원금 수령했다는 뉴스는 없었다.

When Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, then Liberal leader, told a roomful of female supporters at a political fundraiser in 2013 he admired China’s “basic dictatorship,” it turns out he wasn’t kidding.

While not at the level of an actual dictator like Chinese President Xi Jinping, Trudeau is using the public health and economic crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic as an excuse to bypass Parliament and reduce scrutiny of his government.

While Parliament normally has a summer break, this is financially irresponsible during an unprecedented time of enormous government spending programs being launched day after day by the Liberal government, because of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Spending which merits serious scrutiny by Parliament.

Despite that, the Liberals concocted a deal with the NDP to dismiss Parliament in return for a national sick leave program, which comes under provincial jurisdiction, would cost employers more, and which Trudeau didn’t run on in the election.

Under this Liberal-NDP agreement, MPs will have only four hours on June 17 to debate and approve up to $150 billion in COVID-19-related spending by the Trudeau government.

On Friday, Parliamentary Budget Officer Yves Giroux, a non-partisan, independent financial watchdog, called this decision “unfortunate to say the least.”

Giroux told a Commons committee it will be “a very expensive four hours, potentially, for Canadian taxpayers” because “the amount of scrutiny for this unprecedented spending will also be unprecedented, but for the wrong reasons.”

This is because there’s so little time “for parliamentarians to look at these important amounts of spending and to hold the government to account.”

The Liberals and NDP argue a Commons committee will continue holding hearings on COVID-19 in June, but that’s not the same as parliamentary oversight, particularly since MPs will consider the government’s pandemic spending package in an information vacuum.

The reason for that is Trudeau and Finance Minister Bill Moreau haven’t set a date for the federal budget, or even an economic statement, for the 2020-21 fiscal year, which began April 1.

This is consistent with efforts by the Liberals from the start of the pandemic to restrict the role of Parliament in overseeing government spending, claiming their concern is for the safety of MPs, in the same way governments invoke “national security” to avoid answering questions.

Meanwhile, media scrutiny of Trudeau has been reduced to daily, heavily-controlled appearances by the PM outside his official residence.



While Parliament normally has a summer break, this is financially irresponsible during an unprecedented time of enormous government spending programs being launched day after day by the Liberal government, because of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Spending which merits serious scrutiny by Parliament.

Despite that, the Liberals concocted a deal with the NDP to dismiss Parliament in return for a national sick leave program, which comes under provincial jurisdiction, would cost employers more, and which Trudeau didn’t run on in the election.

Under this Liberal-NDP agreement, MPs will have only four hours on June 17 to debate and approve up to $150 billion in COVID-19-related spending by the Trudeau government.

On Friday, Parliamentary Budget Officer Yves Giroux, a non-partisan, independent financial watchdog, called this decision “unfortunate to say the least.”

Giroux told a Commons committee it will be “a very expensive four hours, potentially, for Canadian taxpayers” because “the amount of scrutiny for this unprecedented spending will also be unprecedented, but for the wrong reasons.”

This is because there’s so little time “for parliamentarians to look at these important amounts of spending and to hold the government to account.”

The Liberals and NDP argue a Commons committee will continue holding hearings on COVID-19 in June, but that’s not the same as parliamentary oversight, particularly since MPs will consider the government’s pandemic spending package in an information vacuum.

The reason for that is Trudeau and Finance Minister Bill Moreau haven’t set a date for the federal budget, or even an economic statement, for the 2020-21 fiscal year, which began April 1.

This is consistent with efforts by the Liberals from the start of the pandemic to restrict the role of Parliament in overseeing government spending, claiming their concern is for the safety of MPs, in the same way governments invoke “national security” to avoid answering questions.

Meanwhile, media scrutiny of Trudeau has been reduced to daily, heavily-controlled appearances by the PM outside his official residence.

While Parliament normally has a summer break, this is financially irresponsible during an unprecedented time of enormous government spending programs being launched day after day by the Liberal government, because of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Spending which merits serious scrutiny by Parliament.

Despite that, the Liberals concocted a deal with the NDP to dismiss Parliament in return for a national sick leave program, which comes under provincial jurisdiction, would cost employers more, and which Trudeau didn’t run on in the election.

Under this Liberal-NDP agreement, MPs will have only four hours on June 17 to debate and approve up to $150 billion in COVID-19-related spending by the Trudeau government.

On Friday, Parliamentary Budget Officer Yves Giroux, a non-partisan, independent financial watchdog, called this decision “unfortunate to say the least.”

Giroux told a Commons committee it will be “a very expensive four hours, potentially, for Canadian taxpayers” because “the amount of scrutiny for this unprecedented spending will also be unprecedented, but for the wrong reasons.”

This is because there’s so little time “for parliamentarians to look at these important amounts of spending and to hold the government to account.”

The Liberals and NDP argue a Commons committee will continue holding hearings on COVID-19 in June, but that’s not the same as parliamentary oversight, particularly since MPs will consider the government’s pandemic spending package in an information vacuum.

The reason for that is Trudeau and Finance Minister Bill Moreau haven’t set a date for the federal budget, or even an economic statement, for the 2020-21 fiscal year, which began April 1.

This is consistent with efforts by the Liberals from the start of the pandemic to restrict the role of Parliament in overseeing government spending, claiming their concern is for the safety of MPs, in the same way governments invoke “national security” to avoid answering questions.

Meanwhile, media scrutiny of Trudeau has been reduced to daily, heavily-controlled appearances by the PM outside his official residence.

During them, Trudeau gives brief statements about new spending initiatives to the public, followed by limited media questioning, presided over by the PM’s handlers.

The odds Trudeau will come close to answering a question he’s been asked are a daily crap shoot.

While there are typically some reporters on scene, many of the questions come in by phone, a format which anyone who has covered politics knows works to the politician’s advantage, because it results in more stilted and less aggressive questioning, compared to facing reporters in a scrum.

Oddly, supermarkets, pharmacies, banks, gas stations and other essential services have found ways to function safely, while interacting live with the public, throughout the pandemic.

Trudeau and the Liberals, who don’t consider Parliament an essential service, have not because it works to their political advantage not to do so.


lgoldstein@postmedia.com

https://torontosun.com/opinion/columnists/goldstein-trudeau-hides-behind-covid-19-secrecy

No comments: