Friday, December 09, 2016

박근혜 대통령 탄핵안 국회통과. 황총리 권한대행운영. 야당도적들 정권탈취에 혈안일테고....


 한국이  어떤나라이고,  국민성은 어떤 자질을  갖고있나를  적나라하게  전세계에 보여준,  한국 제2의 국치일이, 금요일(12월9일,2016)이었다.  국격은 끝이 보이지않는  나락으로 떨어져, 다시 튀오 오르기까지는,  넋빠진 국민들이  여러면에서  참아내기 힘든 수치심을 감내해야 할것이다.  여의도 도적들은  국가와 민족을 위하는 것은 눈꼽만큼도 없고, 오직 당리 당략에, 오늘 제2의 국치일을 스스로 만들어 버렸다.

일당5만원짜리 동원된 데모데들은 이제 Job을 잃었으니, 다시 집에가서 Baby sitting 하던가, 아니면 또  비슷한 일자리를 찾아 동냥아치 노릇하겠지....... 해외교민들은, 한국인이라는 자긍심을  완전  잃었다.

외신들은  자세히 그내용을 보도하고 있는데,  그중에서 몇개를 발췌해 봤다.


부정스캔달에 연루되여 온 박근혜 대통령에 대한 탄핵안이 국회에서 통과됐다. 투표결과 찬성234표, 반대 56표로 가결됐는데, 이는 박대통령이속해있는 새누리당의원들이 합세하여  찬성표를 던졌다는 뜻이다.
황교안 총리가 대통령직을 수행하게된다.   수만명의 데모데들이 박대통령의  하야를 외치며 수주째 거리를 점령해왔었다.  투표결과를 본후, 대통령은 "저의 불찰로 국가를 혼란에 빠뜨린점에 대해 다시한번 사과 드린다"라고 했다.


이렇게 혼란속으로 몰아가 원인의 중심에는 대통령 박근혜와 국정을 논의했던  절친 '최순실'의 관계가 얽혀있다.  그녀는 친분관계를 악용하여 국정운영에 영향을 미쳤고,  불법으로 경제적 이익을 챙겼다는점을 들어 노도와 같은 비난을 받았었다.  현재 그녀는 기소되여, 권력남용, 협박죄 등의 조사를 받고있다.
검사들은 박근혜 대통령이 이러한 부정에 깊이 연루된 점을 집중 조사할것이라고 말하고 있지만, 대통령은 이를 부인하고 있는 상태다.


박대통령이  어떤일을 저지른 것일까?


박대통령과 최순실은, 당시 군사정권의 대통령인 아버지를 암살하려는 흉계에서, 옆에 있었던  영부인 어머니를 잃었던,  1970년대부터 아주 가까운 친구였었다.  최순실의 아버지는 이상한 종교의 교주로 당시 영애였던 박근혜의 멘터역활을 했었다고 한다.

2013년 박근혜가 대통령에 당선된후, 최순실(60세)은 박대통령과의 친분관계를 이용하여 재벌들에게 그녀가 운영하고 있던 두개의 재단에 성금하도록 압력을 가했고, 그렇게 해서 모금된 돈을 그녀의 개인목적을 위해 사용하는데 사용했었다.

지난 화요일,  재벌 총수들은 국회청문회에 출석하여, 성금의 목적이 그들이 정치적으로 이득을 챙기기위해서 한것이 아닐까의 여부를  심하게 추궁당했었다.

또한 박대통령 역시, 최순실이 정부정책에 정부정책결정에 적절치 않은 방법으로 참여하여 국정을 농락케한 점에 대해 여러번 사과를 했었다.


지금 어떤일이 벌어지고 있나?


국회 투표에서 가결된 의미는 한국최초의 여성대통령인 박근혜의 대통령직 수행정지를 뜻한다.  이제 탄핵안은 헌법재판소로 이관되여,  이관된 그날로 부터 180이내에 최종 결정을 내려지게 된다.  만약에 9명의 재판관중 6명이 찬성쪽으로 판결을 하게되면, 박대통령은, 한국의 민주정치가 시작된 이래, 첫번째로 현직에서 물러나는 최초의 대통령이 되며, 판결된 날로 부터 60일 이내에 대통령 선거를 치러야 한다.

2004년도에는 당시 대통령이었던 노무현이 탄핵되여 2개월간 대통령직이 정지됐었다.
어쨋던간에 헌법재판소의 판결이 국회탄핵결의안이 불법으로 나와 노무현은 다시 대통령직을 수행하게 됐었다.


누가 박대통령을 대신할 인물일가?


현재 59세의 검사(Prosecutor)출신 황교안 총리는, 이제 대통령직을 수행하게됐다.
2015년 6월에 총리가 되기전에는 법무장관으로 봉직했었다.  2014년 법무장관으로 재직시 북괴와 연관되여 비난받고 있었던, 통진당의 불법정치행위(banning of the Unified Progressive Party)를 금지하는데 중추적 역활을 했었다. 그러한 조치는 "국제사면위원회"의 인권부서로 부터 비난을 받았었다.


South Korea’s National Assembly voted by a huge margin Friday to impeach President Park Geun-hye over her role in a corruption and influence-peddling scandal, forcing her to immediately hand over the running of the country to a caretaker prime minister.
But despite the clear condemnation from both politicians and the general public, Park signaled that she would remain defiant even while being stripped of power and would wait with a "calm and clear mind" while the conservative-leaning Constitutional Court decided whether or not to uphold the impeachment motion.
That means that South Korea could be in for a long period of paralysis. The court now has six months to rule, creating a power vacuum in South Korea at the same time as the United States goes through its own presidential transition.
A total of 234 lawmakers voted in favor of the impeachment motion Friday, well beyond the two-thirds majority, or 200 votes, that proponents of impeachment needed to oust the president. That meant dozens of lawmakers from Park's conservative Saenuri party crossed the aisle to vote with the 171 opposition and independent lawmakers pushing for impeachment.
People gathered in front of the National Assembly chanted “We won, we won!” after the voting results came out, while others danced and waved South Korean flags.

"I heard grave voices of the people and the National Assembly, and I sincerely hope this chaotic situation will be resolved soon," Park told a meeting of her cabinet convened shortly after the impeachment vote. "I sincerely apologize to the people for causing such widespread chaos while our national security situation and the economy are going through a difficult time," she said, citing everything from bird flu to the challenge the cold winter would pose to the poor.
But the president, who last week said she would stand down if the assembly demanded it, reverted to her previous defiant stance.
“I will respond to the procedure of the Constitutional Court and the special prosecutors’ investigation with a calm and clear mind,” she told her ministers, according to remarks distributed by her office, urging them to get back to work and minimize disruption to the country while the court deliberates.

Meantime, Park's duties will fall to prime minister Hwang Kyo-ahn, a political independent and former justice minister.
South Korea’s political crisis could become a trigger for bigger change
The vote was a landslide for the forces that want to impeach Park. Only 56 lawmakers in the 300-seat assembly voted against ousting her.
"This result exceeded our expectations. It means the ruling Saenuri party members have taken the citizens’ demands very seriously," said Park Young-sun, a representative in the main opposition Minjoo, or Democratic, party. "Now the National Assembly needs to calm down and try to take this opportunity to rebuild the nation," she said.

The scandal centers on allegations that the famously aloof Park — the country’s first female president and daughter of military strongman Park Chung-hee, who ruled South Korea in the 1960s and 1970s — took advice from a secret confidante on a wide variety of topics, including North Korean policy and her wardrobe.
Prosecutors said that the confidante, Choi Soon-sil, a lifelong friend and daughter of a shadowy cult leader, used that relationship to enrich herself by at least $70 million and gain advantages for her family. Choi has been indicted on charges, including abuse of power and extortion, and is in detention.
Prosecutors have said the president appeared to have been an accomplice and want to question her about her role in the case, but she has refused. She is immune from prosecution while president but could be charged once she leaves office.
The public anger over the case is palpable. Hundreds of thousands have been demonstrating in central Seoul for weeks, calling on Park to step down, her approval ratings have fallen to 5 percent. Demonstrators massed outside the National Assembly Friday in support of the impeachment motion and another protest is scheduled for this Saturday.
Representatives in Park's conservative Saenuri party had no choice but to listen to the people and support the impeachment motion, said Kim Dong-choon, professor of social sciences at Sungkonghoe University.

But the government could now find itself hamstrung by the vote, Kim said. "Most of the cabinet members have been appointed by Park so their legitimacy will be questioned by this impeachment. The government won't be able to make important policy decisions and the power will shift to the National Assembly."
South Korea’s president offers to resign if demanded by lawmakers
Park is be only the second president to be impeached since South Korea democratized in 1987. Roh Moo-hyun, a progressive, was impeached in 2004 for minor election law violations but, after deliberating for two months, the Constitutional Court overturned the motion. While it found that Roh had indeed breached the law, it ruled that the charges were not serious enough to warrant his removal.
The conservative-leaning court now has 180 days to consider Park’s case, but experts doubt it will take that long.
“As this is not a criminal court, one or two serious violations can justify Park’s dismissal," said Chung Tae-ho, a law professor and expert on the constitution at Kyunghee University. "The gravity of this case is expected to put pressure on the court to rule sooner than later as it is important to remove uncertainty from the nation.”
But the process could still be complicated. Two justices are set to resign within the first three months of the year and analysts think it unlikely that the prime minister would act to replace them during a time of limbo. That would mean six of the remaining seven judges would have to vote in favor of upholding the motion.
Hwang, the prime minister, has been caught up in the furor engulfing the president.
As the scandal widened, Park last month said she would replace Hwang with a senior official from former progressive president Roh’s administration, a move intended to both clear the decks and to placate the left-wing opposition parties. But they were instead incensed for not been consulted and Park was forced to withdraw her nominee, meaning Hwang has continued in his position.
Kweon Seong-dong, chairman of the judiciary committee in the National Assembly, said that how soon the court could rule would depend on whether it decided to proceed on the facts it already has, or wait for prosecutors and an independent counsel to finish their investigations.
"If the court considers there are enough reasons for the president to be impeached based on the current investigation findings, the court can rule in favor of upholding the impeachment motion," he said. "But if the court decides to consider all of the violations, then it will have to deliberate on all of them.”
Kweon, a Saenuri party lawmaker, did not think the landslide vote in the assembly would have an effect on the court, although he said the huge outpouring of public opinion on the scandal could influence the judges.
Seo reported from Seoul.






test
test

http://www.cnn.com/2016/12/09/asia/south-korea-park-geun-hye-impeachment-vote/index.html

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/south-korean-assembly-set-to-vote-on-presidents-impeachment/2016/12/08/b1429d8c-bd8c-11e6-ae79-bec72d34f8c9_story.html?hpid=hp_hp-top-table-main_no-name%3Ahomepage%2Fstory&utm_term=.89d463c29bb8

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-38259984

No comments:

Post a Comment